|  |   Dr. Alleyne's address to the I Regional 
              Coordination Meeting , November 30th - December 3rd 1999, Washington 
              D.C. USA Transcription
 Dr. George A. O. Alleyne Thank you very much.  Let me add my words of welcome to those given 
              by Dr. Packer, Dr. Casas and Dr. Roses. It is a great pleasure to 
              have you here in Washington.  As Dr. Casas said this meeting has a double 
              significance. It is the First Meeting of the Regional Coordination 
              of the Virtual Health Library, and the Seventh Meeting of the Latin 
              American System for Information on Health Sciences. I am pleased 
              to see so many of you here, and such a large representation bears 
              witness to the importance of the topic to all of you. I expect that 
              this indicates interest that the Virtual Health Library be a truly 
              participatory exercise, and it can only flourish if it really is 
              a participatory effort. It is important that we thank the Government 
              of Brazil formally. Our Organization has been fortunate in having 
              a partner such as the Government of Brazil that has contributed 
              so much to having our Library maintained in São Paulo. I 
              would like you to give a round of applause for the support of the 
              Government of Brazil to BIREME. (applause)  I think it is important to recognize also 
              the Federal University of São Paulo / Paulista School of 
              Medicine, which has given tremendous support to the Center, especially 
              when it went through difficult times.  This will be a week full of activities and 
              time for reflection on the technical cooperation that you have received 
              or you would like to receive from PAHO with respect to the establishment 
              of the Virtual Health Library in your countries. I know this has 
              been an intensive program for the past year, with many visits from 
              Mr. Abel Packer and his colleagues to the countries. I also know 
              that many of you will claim that much more needs to be done in the 
              year 2000.  I am sure that you will focus your discussion 
              in large part on the document that BIREME has prepared as a guide 
              for the Virtual Health Library. And this, of course, is a modification 
              of the original proposal in 1998. I hope that those of you who were 
              in Costa Rica in 1998 will recognize the modifications and the advances 
              that have been made. This Virtual Health Library, although in embryonic 
              form, is already in place in several of the countries where the 
              emphasis is on the participation of a wide variety of actors. The 
              idea of having a constitutive committee or consultative group, in 
              each country where there is a Virtual Library is an essential step 
              to the success of such an endeavor.  When the idea was presented to me a couple 
              of years ago, I had to be clear, and to convince myself that this 
              approach was consistent, not only with the work of the Organization, 
              but beyond that, was consistent with the basic values and principles 
              that sustain PAHO. As Dr. Casas has mentioned, these two values 
              are equity and the Pan-American approach will be reflected in some 
              of the work and ideas that will be presented to you.  I have spoken to you more than once, with varying 
              degrees of passion and hopefully with varying degrees of persuasion 
              about the importance of information. When I have spoken, I've adopted 
              a mainly utilitarian instrumental approach, affirming that information 
              is a major tool for your activities.  I will not go into details, because these are 
              topics that merit a lot more discussion, but I'd like to leave with 
              you two important concepts and perhaps there will be another opportunity 
              for me to go into them more fully.  When we speak of the information revolution, 
              we should go back to fifty years ago. Yesterday, we went to a restaurant 
              called the Sea Catch, in Georgetown where the first computer was 
              built in this country. It just was about fifty years ago that the 
              information revolution really started, and over the course of these 
              fifty years, possibly up to ten or fifteen years ago-information 
              has been useful in terms of processes, if you wish-and a computer, 
              which has been the trigger of information revolution was important 
              in terms of these processes. Computers are in your cars. If you 
              wish to tune your car, it is done by computers; your watches, in 
              fact, have mini computers. The technology of the information revolution 
              has been instrumental in terms of the processes it has favored; 
              it has allowed humankind to do things more efficiently.  But recently, the information revolution has 
              perhaps shifted to a much higher, different, plane. The Internet 
              has indeed eliminated time and space as Martin Luther King would 
              say, and infinite possibilities of networks of networks of networks 
              will change the way we see the world. What is important for us, 
              is that we will start to examine social institutions of the information 
              revolution in the same way that we appreciated the social institutions 
              of the industrial revolution. The organization and development of 
              these new social institutions will be as important for development 
              of our society as were the social institutions of the industrial 
              revolution. The factory, for example, was a social institution that 
              developed from the industrial revolution, the steam engine was its 
              first major development. I believe that these social institutions, 
              these new institutions that develop from the information revolution, 
              will be forms of virtual arrangements. You will see virtual arrangements 
              in the social institutions that develop as a result of the information 
              revolution. I will predict that these virtual arrangements will 
              arise around specific themes in the same way that the social institutions 
              arose specific forms of production of the industrial revolution. 
              You will find that this approach, this development of the virtual 
              institutions will be one in which there are different relationships 
              between the producers and the users. I accepted the idea that the 
              Virtual Library is genuinely an innovation, not only in terms of 
              the hardware, but in terms of concept, because I believe it is at 
              the edge of the development of these kinds of social institutions 
              that will result from the information revolution. You must not confound 
              the information revolution with computers, we must look beyond the 
              information revolution in terms of institutions that will develop 
              as a consequence of it.  The second issue that has occupied my thinking 
              and has to do with my acceptance of the Virtual Library is the concept 
              of information being a global public good, and the need for the 
              systems to insure equity in the availability of global public goods. 
              Nations, by definition are not the guardians of global public goods, 
              and it is the interconnectedness of the virtual marketplace for 
              information that may guarantee the preservation of equitable distribution 
              of such public goods. Nations are not competent to guarantee the 
              availability of global public goods, so we have to look at different 
              institutions to do so.  Many of the institutions that have been set 
              up to guarantee the availability of global public goods are under 
              threat. Those who have read what is happening in Seattle now will 
              understand the threat under which these institutions are being put. 
              I am predicting that these social institutions such as the Internet, 
              through its interconnectedness will turn out to be the real guardians 
              of global public goods. A friend of mine, Ilona Kickbush, used to 
              present the idea of health being a global commons, and I have said 
              elsewhere that institutions, with the concept of the Virtual Library 
              are akin to the global commons. Those here who are sociologists 
              will remember Harding's theory of the commons, which simply put 
              says that if you have a commons to feed cattle, the persons who 
              originally put their cattle there derive the original and maximum 
              benefits. As more people come into the commons, then there is decreasing 
              individual benefit, and the problem is how to preserve a global 
              commons without having it deteriorate to the extent that everybody, 
              then, is at a disadvantage. One of the problems of the commons, 
              which applies to the Virtual Library, is to guarantee that it is 
              beneficial to all. The critical issues are communication and information. 
              Research has shown that to the extent that there is good information 
              among all the possible actors, then there is a possibility of the 
              global commons serving all. And that is why we have this meeting. 
              We have this meeting so that those of you who participate in the 
              global commons, share information about the virtual space. Those 
              of you have a stake in it will participate such that is mutual benefit 
              to all. We have called this coordination meeting so that both users 
              and producers of the information can be involved. The only way to 
              guarantee that this Virtual Library is going to ensure equitable 
              access to that global public good that is scientific technical information; 
              is through participation and sharing among the persons involved. 
              That is the critical issue.  I wish to persuade you with all the force that 
              I have that you are on an exciting enterprise and you must redouble 
              your efforts to understand what is involved in the establishment 
              and maintenance of this Virtual Library. You must understand the 
              challenges that are involved in the Virtual Library. It is only 
              through understanding, dialogue and interchange that we are going 
              to have the sustainability of this commons which I think is so critical 
              for all of us, not only now, but in the future. Let me, again, say 
              thank you very much for coming. Let me welcome you once again, and 
              declare the conference officially open.     |